Join the discussion

Write your take first — we'll ask for email only when you're ready to publish.

  • Hacker News
  • Last year ChatGPT helped save my life from having a stroke. LLMs are incredibly beneficial in providing medical information and advice today.
  • Hmm. So OpenAI doesn't care about other people's terms, copyrights or any sort of IP; but they get to have their own terms.
  • I wouldn't be surprised to see new products from OpenAI targeted specifically at doctors and/or lawyers. Forbidding them from using the regular ChatGPT with legal terms would be a good way to do price discrimination.
  • I was wondering when they would start with the regulations.

    Next will be: you're allowed to use it, if your company/product is "HippocraticGPT"-certified, a bit like SOC or PCI compliance.

    This way they can craft an instance of GPT for your specific purposes (law, medicine, etc) and you know it's "safe" to use.

    This way they sell EE licenses, which is where the big $$$ are.

    by mk89
  • Wasn't there a recent OAI dev day in which they had some users come on stage and discuss how helpful ChatGPT was in parsing diagnoses from different doctors?

    I guess the legal risks were large enough to outweigh this

  • Article has since been updated for some clarity;

       >    Correction
    
    An earlier version of this story suggested OpenAI had ended medical and legal advice. However the company said "the model behaviour has also not changed." [0]

    [0] https://www.ctvnews.ca/sci-tech/article/chatgpt-users-cant-u...

  • I have seen more than once people using ChatGPT as a psychologist and psychiatrist and self diagnosing mental illnesses. It would be hilarious if it was not so disasterous. People with real questions get roped in by an enthusiastically confirming sycophantic model that will never question or push back, just confirm and lead on.

    Tbh, and I usually do not like this way of thought, but these are lawsuits waiting to happen.

  • I read this not as "you can't ask ChatGPT about {medical or legal topic}" but rather "you can't build something on ChatGPT that provides {medical or legal} advice or support to someone else."

    For example, Epic couldn't embed ChatGPT into their application to have it read your forms for you. You can still ask it - but Epic can't build it.

    That said, I haven't found the specific terms and conditions that are mentioned but not quoted in context.

Explore Birbla archives