Join the discussion
Write your take first — we'll ask for email only when you're ready to publish.
- Hacker News
- Lose too many generators, did putting a pause on The Fable not free up enough capacity, or something else? Who knows!
Can't wait for debugging to be solved. Hell, I might even subscribe for 'mostly'.
- Resolve elevated errors, don't stop until you are finished.by pton_xd
- How is their "Claude for Government" having such a good uptime? I thought they were a supply chain risk and banned from use by the government?by rootlocus
- How does Claude fix Claude when Claude is down?by blitzar
- This is every few weeks, I cancelled Anthropic and now use Codex only. Anthropic has been a hot mess since at least december in my usage, and has only gotten worse in 2026.by bastard_op
- I’ve been using Codex w GPT 5.5 more than Claude Code recently. I think Anthropic won the marketing game because Codex is quite good, even better IME.by wxw
- The errors are infrequent enough that this normally wouldn't be an issue for me.
Except, starting this morning, one very long running session decided to start spawning subagents for each task. I'm not sure what caused this emergent behavior, but it seemed to be working fine, so I was eager to see where it went.
Except, as soon as a subagent hits a 500 error, the main agent seemingly doesn't know what to do. It kind of panics—"now the tree/install state is unknown!"—and ultimately does a git checkout "to verify and restore a known-good state before anything else".
I've paused the job for now since it's a sort of background experiment.
by Wowfunhappy - I do feel like for all their dogfooding of AI coding, their own software/APIs are quite buggy and work against their message.
Claude Code is especially buggy in windows terminal. The rendering is quite slow, choppy and lines frequently get garbled.
In contrast, using antigravity cli is the exact opposite: fast, smooth and very responsive.
by evilturnip