Birbla

Join the discussion

Write your take first — we'll ask for email only when you're ready to publish.

Sign in
  • Hacker News
  • There is something very wrong on chrome mac, for me at least.

    I mouse over the horizontal section and everything starts blinking and jittering wildly, then disappears. Vertical section has same issue.

    by jonahx
  • I did this with CSS forever ago. Make an alpha gradient (from background color to transparent), save it as png, add an element to use the background-image on, and use absolute positioning to put it on top. Finish it with pointer-events: none

    Why on earth would it be a big deal not to use JS for this. Even a frost effect has been demoed in CSS.

    Of course nowadays you don't need the png.

    by tosti
  • Neat! I'd much rather just copy-paste the CSS from the site though, would never install something like this as a package.
    by ptak
  • Might be useful: https://untested.sonnet.io/notes/natural-gradients-in-css/
    by rpastuszak
  • What is happening here and why is it special? The site itself does show, but does not tell (which in itself is somewhat refreshing).
    by Stitch4223
  • This is an effect that is widely used but is generally done with JS.

    The effect indicates to users who may not have scroll bars enabled that a box can be scrolled. The fade should be removed when a box can’t be scrolled in that direction.

    CSS effects tend (tend) to be faster and conceptually is a better place for effects anyway (e: and works with JS disabled, which is cool)

    by lelandfe
  • Might want to set `overscroll-behavior: contain;` on those scroll areas, having the whole page move up and down (or worse, navigating Back when scrolling left) isn't great UX.

    https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/Reference/P...

    by franky47
  • I also love the pure CSS parallax effect of the "tw-fade" title shadow using multiple spans with different styles that fade in and out based on scroll position. Very clever!
    by maxjustus
  • I just had need of this, dropped it in - works great. The only slight issue I had is that if there's a tiny amount of overflow, you basically don't get to see the fade because it's designed to disappear as you reach 100% scroll. In practice, that means I've noticed single chars getting lopped off with no visible gradient. I don't think there's much way around this beyond adding a bit of right hand padding to the track
    by wuhhh
  • FYI scrolling this page is slow as balls on my computer. Firefox on Ubuntu.

    I don't know if this page is a demonstration of your plugin, I'm guessing yes but I can't see any masking going on, it seems to scroll just like a normal page but much more laggy.

    EDIT: Oh I see in your comment now, it doesn't work in Firefox. My mistake.

    by jstanley
  • This has a frame drop issue on Chrome Version 149.0.7827.156. It isn't close to smooth on my browser.
    by rtrigoso
  • I was wondering the same thing and I'm in Chrome. The "Horizontal" and "Vertical" sections don't seem to do anything, but maybe I'm just not understanding what I should be looking for?
    by RyanOD
  • This is extremely laggy on my computer. It may not be a top-end gaming supercomputer but it's no slouch either.
    by Hugsbox
  • It might be related to the liquid glass imitation in the color scheme picker
    by sheept
  • It's fine on my phone, Brave Android. Maybe it doesn't work on Firefox?
    by esperent
  • hey all, just released a plugin to scratch an itch. i'd been lazily adding linear gradients on the edges of scrollviews and animating them with JS based on scroll position. turns out you can do a lot better with pure CSS now by leveraging masking + the new CSS scroll animations API.

    works in pretty much all browers excepting firefox which doesn't have CSS scroll animations yet, but the nightly version does, so it should be generally available soon.

    demo site: https://pete.design/tw-fade

    github: https://github.com/petekp/tw-fade

    npmjs: https://www.npmjs.com/package/tw-fade

    if you use it i'd love to hear how it goes and if you have any feedback.

    by petekp
  • I don't find tw-fade particularly useful for me right now, but clicked through your site and I have to say I really like your approach to things (stress-testing shimmers comes to mind), big kudos.

    edit: the scrubber split animation is dope too!

    by holistio
  • Doesn't seem to work in Chrome 147.0.7727.137 or Edge 149.0.4022.69.

    Clicking the different options and then scrolling horizontally or vertically does not change any behaviour, appearance or animation.

    My understanding is that something should change in the occluded elements that are partially outside the scroll area.

    by nailer
  • The fade affects scroll bars, which is quite unpleasant (and arguably catastrophic if you have two-dimensional scrolling). The traditional background-image technique avoided this by sitting inside the scroll area. I don’t think you can achieve that with mask, without an additional element. But I think it might be worth that extra element.
    by chrismorgan
  • You can achieve that with a background-image, because you can stack multiple gradients.

    Since this problem bothers me every time I see it on the web, I put together a quick example:

    https://jsfiddle.net/ng7hmuxd

    by dag11
  • What's edge masking and what am I looking at? I clicked through several of the options and I don't see any difference. There just seems to be a really basic gradient shadow.

    I have gpu enabled in google chrome (verified by visiting chrome://gpu) on Chrome/149.0.7827.155 on Linux.

    by porphyra
  • I am also struggling to see what clicking any of the options in the demo changes. I don't consider myself advanced in design knowledge, but I'm pretty average in visual perception.

    Perhaps some or all of them don't work in Firefox for Android, and I'm just seeing a fallback behavior that does work?

    Edit: Just tested in Chrome desktop and Firefox desktop on Linux, still struggling to see a difference in any of the demo regions (which I assume are supposed to demo the option when selected?). Also scroll behavior is graphically laggy/jumpy in Chrome, but not Firefox.

    by chao-
  • It took me forever to realize this, but I'm pretty sure the "options" ("ghost", "melt", "evanesce", and so on) aren't anything at all, just terms that are all adjacent to "fade" which can be selected for some reason. A search for those terms in the repo doesn't come up with anything.

    I was really hoping to see what the "melt" effect looked like :(

    by sebular