

Discussion summary
Dolosse are South African wave-breaking structures used globally, with some debate about their effectiveness and differences from other forms like Tetrapods. The article linked is considered uninformative by some users.
What the discussion says
- Some users question the effectiveness of coastal armoring like Dolosse.
- Others highlight the global use of Dolosse and their specific suitability for high-energy coastlines.
- There is mention of alternative methods like sand replenishment being more effective.
“Dolos are used worldwide, especially in high-energy coastlines.”
“Coastal armoring often does not prevent erosion, sand replenishment is preferred.”
Comments
Hacker News
by kamma4434
by paduc
There's lots of different forms and shapes of wave breakers, like the Tetrapods [1] that you can find over here across pretty much every coast in Europe.
Maybe I'm just not getting it why the Dolosse shape is superior?
by cookiengineer
by sgt
by mcc1ane
by kulahan
by zulux
by ge96
We could just stop building so close to shore…
by bix6
Not that simple. Example: east of Lauwersoog (north shore of the Netherlands) there's a dyke reinforcement project underway. Roughly 2/3 of the dyke's seaside is covered with regular rows of interlocking concrete blocks (~25 x 25 cm top view). At the base of the dyke, there's stone rubble to dissipate wave energy. These are heavy stones: 100s of kg each on average. But loose - some even wobble if you step on them! There's probably some other things in there like layer(s) of geotextile & such.
I'm pretty sure if those rubble stones weren't there, waves would 'eat' some rows of the smaller blocks, wash away a few metres of sand, then rows above would collapse, expose more sand, etc.
So it's not like those stones aren't doing anything.
In other places on the Dutch coast, it's more common to pump sand onto the beach every X year to replace what the sea eroded. 'Must read' in this context:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sand_engine
TLDR; wave patterns, coastlines & what's behind them are different. So are strategies to protect them.
by RetroTechie
by liotier
by arcza
by Cthulhu_
I'm having a hard time to find a good source to quote but look for: "sylt tetrapoden" if you want to dive deeper.
by walski
by walski
by Havoc
by duggan
by tclancy
Further down that jetty are structures with the actual Dolos geometry. It would be interesting to know if, specifically, those geometries were chosen specifically to be placed in those two parts of the wall as they are for specific properties, or if came down to having certain quantities made on hand and their distributions matched the shape of the wall required, or what.
You can see what I mean, this distinction in the exact location where that photo is taken on google maps, here:
https://maps.app.goo.gl/Vn3tGhM81oMqPVpm9
-33.899126, 18.412751 Mouille Point, Cape Town, 8005, South Africa
by mk_stjames
> A dolos ... is a type of tetrapod
but also, the Wikipedia article for tetrapod:
> One of the earliest designs is the Tetrapod, invented in 1950. Other proprietary designs include the Modified Cube (United States, 1959), the Stabit (United Kingdom, 1961), the Akmon[W] (The Netherlands, 1962), the Dolos (South Africa, 1963), the Stabilopod [ro] (Romania, 1969),[7] the Seabee (Australia, 1978), the Accropode[W] (France, 1981), the Hollow Cube (Germany, 1991), the A-jack[W] (United States, 1998), the Xbloc[W] (The Netherlands, 2001) and KOLOS[W] (India, 2010) among others.
I have put Ws next to ones with their own Wikipedia page.
by petesergeant
I’m saying “may be” because it is possible that the center “arm” of the Dolosse is too large to make a true tetrahedon. That’s a degree of freedom in the design.
> It would be interesting to know if, specifically, those geometries were chosen specifically to be placed in those two parts of the wall
My guess would be that Dolosses interlock better than Tetrapods, allowing for steeper inclines on stacks of them.
by Someone
by nusq
While a little more costly, 316 stainless steel should work just fine.
by markdown
by silves89
Join the discussion
Write your take first — we'll ask for email only when you're ready to publish.
- Hacker News
- The article is embarassing. Basically it says nothing but links to wikipedia. I’m saving you a click: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dolosby kamma4434
- The blog article mentions 80 tons while the wiki article mentions 8 tons. Are they using the same definition of a ton ?by paduc
- Not sure why Dolosse are so special?
There's lots of different forms and shapes of wave breakers, like the Tetrapods [1] that you can find over here across pretty much every coast in Europe.
Maybe I'm just not getting it why the Dolosse shape is superior?
by cookiengineer - Apparently the Dolosse works a lot better for high energy wave environments like coastline of SA etc. They are used here, and I am sure they considered Tetrapods and there was a reason they weren't suitable.by sgt
- What's the difference between these and KOLOS?by mcc1ane
- Dolos are neither the first nor best ocean… rock… shape, apparently.by kulahan
- Invented by Eric Mowbray Merrifield and his team, which included Piet Grobbelaar and Jack Badham-Thornhill.by zulux
- Neat didn't know that's what they're called you see em in Japan too "over the world" yeahby ge96
- These are cool shaped but they don’t actually work; coastal armoring in general does not work as it does not prevent erosion. Sand replenishment is increasingly the path taken. Australia has an amazing pumping system (a jetty blocked longshore sand transport so they pump it around to the other side).
We could just stop building so close to shore…
by bix6 - > coastal armoring in general does not work as it does not prevent erosion.
Not that simple. Example: east of Lauwersoog (north shore of the Netherlands) there's a dyke reinforcement project underway. Roughly 2/3 of the dyke's seaside is covered with regular rows of interlocking concrete blocks (~25 x 25 cm top view). At the base of the dyke, there's stone rubble to dissipate wave energy. These are heavy stones: 100s of kg each on average. But loose - some even wobble if you step on them! There's probably some other things in there like layer(s) of geotextile & such.
I'm pretty sure if those rubble stones weren't there, waves would 'eat' some rows of the smaller blocks, wash away a few metres of sand, then rows above would collapse, expose more sand, etc.
So it's not like those stones aren't doing anything.
In other places on the Dutch coast, it's more common to pump sand onto the beach every X year to replace what the sea eroded. 'Must read' in this context:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sand_engine
TLDR; wave patterns, coastlines & what's behind them are different. So are strategies to protect them.
by RetroTechie - Save yourself the blogspam, go directly to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave-dissipating_concrete_bloc... and enjoy the whole collection !by liotier
- Bizarre hate towards someone's little blog. And it's not even LLM spam, just someone running their own WP site. By your logic I should save myself the Wikipedia verbosity and just ingest LLM output for any query I have forever.by arcza
- A bit rude, this doesn't come across as spam but a genuine human sharing something interesting they came across. Peak old internet (2000s) content. The wiki article is very short and doesn't actually have more or better pictures.by Cthulhu_
- In Germany (on the island Sylt) they recently removed all of these structures again after decades of them being a staple on Sylt's beaches. They were found to have no positive effect on protecting their shores.
I'm having a hard time to find a good source to quote but look for: "sylt tetrapoden" if you want to dive deeper.
by walski - Ok I stand corrected these are NOT tetrapods. Sorry for the confusionby walski
- I find it hard to believe they have not protective effect. You can throw pretty much anything hard with an irregular shape down and it’ll help scatter energyby Havoc
- Interesting. Been to South Africa a bunch but never clocked that they were different from the more common antecedent, the tetrapod[1].by duggan
- “Hast thou considered the tetrapod?” can finally be answered positively on HackerNews. Hail Satan.by tclancy
- Interestingly the author shows a photo of a spot in Cape Town where there are two distinct structures in use - close up, in the photo, are actually Tetrapods - as pointed out in other comments, these are an earlier invention from France and also used quite extensively throughout many parts of the world (including... right here where the Dolosse were invented).
Further down that jetty are structures with the actual Dolos geometry. It would be interesting to know if, specifically, those geometries were chosen specifically to be placed in those two parts of the wall as they are for specific properties, or if came down to having certain quantities made on hand and their distributions matched the shape of the wall required, or what.
You can see what I mean, this distinction in the exact location where that photo is taken on google maps, here:
https://maps.app.goo.gl/Vn3tGhM81oMqPVpm9
-33.899126, 18.412751 Mouille Point, Cape Town, 8005, South Africa
by mk_stjames - The Wikipedia article:
> A dolos ... is a type of tetrapod
but also, the Wikipedia article for tetrapod:
> One of the earliest designs is the Tetrapod, invented in 1950. Other proprietary designs include the Modified Cube (United States, 1959), the Stabit (United Kingdom, 1961), the Akmon[W] (The Netherlands, 1962), the Dolos (South Africa, 1963), the Stabilopod [ro] (Romania, 1969),[7] the Seabee (Australia, 1978), the Accropode[W] (France, 1981), the Hollow Cube (Germany, 1991), the A-jack[W] (United States, 1998), the Xbloc[W] (The Netherlands, 2001) and KOLOS[W] (India, 2010) among others.
I have put Ws next to ones with their own Wikipedia page.
by petesergeant - Mathematically, I think they both may be tetrahedons. The Tetrapod models it by 4 lines connecting each of its vertices to its center, the Dolosse by two opposite edges connected by a line through the middle.
I’m saying “may be” because it is possible that the center “arm” of the Dolosse is too large to make a true tetrahedon. That’s a degree of freedom in the design.
> It would be interesting to know if, specifically, those geometries were chosen specifically to be placed in those two parts of the wall
My guess would be that Dolosses interlock better than Tetrapods, allowing for steeper inclines on stacks of them.
by Someone - Finnally something I have knowledge of. Dolosse were invent in South Africa many years ago, but they are only one type of concrete block for wave dissipation and protection. Many others exist and some of them are patented and require the payment of royalties to be used. Anyway, in Portugal we do not use dolosse ever. We used it once in Sines deepwater breakwater, which suffered a catastrophic collapse in 1979. The promise of dolosse is that the blocks work together because of their shape and thus the individual block can be lighter and cheaper. This does not work in practice, at least in high energy seas. The ocean is unforgiven. What happens is that if only a few blocks break the whole structure will quickly collapse during a storm. And things can break due to a series of problems and risks. Concrete is only good at resist compression stresses and reinforcement with rebar is almost always a bad idea in ocean conditions, so complex shapes are hard to make and to move without introducing unwanted stresses that reduce the design strength conditions. Other types of blocks rely mostly on their design weight and density, and the shape is just used for increasing energy dissipation and overtopping. For example, tetrapods can be moved with only compression forces on the block.by nusq
- > reinforcement with rebar is almost always a bad idea in ocean conditions
While a little more costly, 316 stainless steel should work just fine.
by markdown - Thanks for this background! I encountered dolosse or something dolosse-like at Praia da Ilha de Tavira, in the Algarve, here: https://www.google.com/maps/place/Farol+de+Tavira+Molhe+Oest...by silves89
Related stories
The family keeping watch over a 52-year-old pot of soup
wsj.com · 90 points · 71 comments
The Age of Reading Is Over
theatlantic.com · 6 points · 0 comments
Flock Cameras Wrongly Tracked Me for Days over 'Stolen' Plates
thedrive.com · 5 points · 0 comments
China tells devs to ditch Claude Code over 'backdoor code' fears
theregister.com · 3 points · 0 comments
Decoding the obfuscated bash script on a Uniqlo t-shirt
tris.sherliker.net · 1147 points · 189 comments
StreetComplete: Fixing OpenStreetMap, one tiny quest at a time
streetcomplete.app · 761 points · 182 comments