Comments
Hacker News
Does the OSC 52 was mentioned?
by inisirex
> DAST is the natural way to catch this class of flaw. The Bright scanner...
by qwertox
So cat -v is no longer harmful?
by hahahaa
ANSI bombs from the MS-DOS days are back for the modern age.
Edit: For those too young to remember - https://stason.org/TULARC/security/computer-virus-l/23-What-...
by nirav72
May I ask, what is DAST exactly? The report doesn't seem to define it, nor does it provide a link to any definition or detail page, not even an abreviation expansion. Is that Dynamic application security testing?
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_application_security_t...
by iku
Every year is apparently a good year for developers to figure out how terminals have worked for decades?
Just… don’t trust inputs you don’t fully control, there’s nothing else to it.
by illliillll
Join the discussion
Write your take first — we'll ask for email only when you're ready to publish.
- Hacker News
- Does the OSC 52 was mentioned?by inisirex
- > DAST is the natural way to catch this class of flaw. The Bright scanner...by qwertox
- So cat -v is no longer harmful?by hahahaa
- ANSI bombs from the MS-DOS days are back for the modern age.
Edit: For those too young to remember - https://stason.org/TULARC/security/computer-virus-l/23-What-...
by nirav72 - May I ask, what is DAST exactly? The report doesn't seem to define it, nor does it provide a link to any definition or detail page, not even an abreviation expansion. Is that Dynamic application security testing?
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_application_security_t...
by iku - Every year is apparently a good year for developers to figure out how terminals have worked for decades?
Just… don’t trust inputs you don’t fully control, there’s nothing else to it.
by illliillll