Join the discussion
Write your take first — we'll ask for email only when you're ready to publish.
- Hacker News
- Nice! It is missing Codex in the agent harnesses comparison IMO.by jceg
- I'd expect google to do well here, since they were historically strong at multimodal and physics.by grim_io
- I'm curious how good the terra/luna results are but there's not enough context here for me to judge 0.786 (terra) vs 0.814 (sol) vs 0.889 (fable).
How do the two lower models compare to e.g. gpt 5.5 or 5.4 or various opus models?
by esperent - Google with apptronic should have good models soonby arisAlexis
- It's kind of interesting this is already out of data as it's missing Kimi 3 and Opus 5.by hartator
- Please forgive my naivety, but are world models (once they are in a consumer-ready form) expected to outperform any currently existing LLM on these sorts of tasks (i.e. of the physical world)?by giwook
- So Fable "won" but it cost $124.76 for marginal performance benefits over the $22.56 5.6 Sol run.by draginol
- A really frustrating partial presentation, given an apparent lack of testing with a spread of efforts for each model.
Given that there's no reason to believe that Fable's xhigh is comparable to GPT-sol's xhigh, or Opus xhigh, for that matter, it would be far more useful to see the effort level where these tasks no longer achieved their goals.
by xnorswap