Join the discussion

Write your take first — we'll ask for email only when you're ready to publish.

  • Hacker News
  • Funny, I was told by HN commenters that worries about AI risk are just a clever marketing strategy on the part of OpenAI and friends. I wonder why they would be working so hard to push back?
  • The only reason OpenAI wants to give 5% of the company to the US government is so they become 'to big to fail'. They dont give a s** about the US, its just a way to get funding when the bubble bursts
  • Meanwhile, the AI critics got an enormous war chest thanks to Vitalic giving them all his dog coins as a joke that ended up being worth almost a billion to fight against AI.

    https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2026/03/14/vitalik-buterin-...

  • Fraud, but a presidential pardon has already been paid for in advance.
  • Is there a state in which this constitutes fraud?
  • >But there don’t seem to be any contributors, or at least not human ones. I ran every article on the site through Pangram (the AI detector that credibly claims a near-zero false-positive rate). Of the 94 articles, 69% came back flagged as fully AI-generated, with another 28% flagged as partially AI-generated. Only three articles were classified as human-authored.

    How credible is this credible claim?

  • Perfectly rational.

    Unleash bots and sock puppets, generate mindless hype. Add a bit of circular accounting.

    Watch the investments roll in and the share price soar up.

    Profit...

  • Probably doing something similar here.

    This place average post went from “look at this new javascript framework” to “I just became 100x more productive with AI” in the last 3 years

Explore Birbla archives