Join the discussion

Write your take first — we'll ask for email only when you're ready to publish.

  • Hacker News
  • I'm sure Elon Musk has told some underling to make sure that Grok attempts to hack into a few companies so they get the street cred to.
  • I see a pattern...
  • Meta never wants to be left out.
  • "Metoo guys, im also doing bad stuff"
  • It's Meta, I'm not sure anyone paying attention could ever assume they aren't doing bad stuff.
  • I can see one company being incompetent. But so many? Should it not be pretty trivial to to track whatever traffic goes out? All this traffic must originate from somewhere or have I massively misunderstood how these things work?
  • Waiting for the “Our model inadvertently hacked the nukes and launched Armageddon” title
  • It feels like Meta would like some of that free advertisement.
  • Interesting that none of the talk around this has touched on any form of enforcement, even though this is illegal activity in US/EU.

    Any fine would be peanuts for them but it might help to refocus the mindset from "oops, misconfiguration" to "test security but do so with care, consent and in line with the law"

  • This is hilarious. How obvious can they be ? Suddenly every LLM is a hacking genius
  • That’s crazy that such errors in isolating the models became a marketing stunt.

    I’m afraid of what it will be next. They will remove guardrails just to provoke more and more headlines

  • > I’m afraid of what it will be next.

    Palantir: our system accidentally started WW3.

  • This reality is wild. It would be like arms manufacturers holding weekly demonstrations of how much collateral damage their latest designs cause in an attempt to increase sales.
  • Everyone loves the opening scene in iron man.
  • They do this in Gaza.
  • apropos of nothing I highly recommend "The Palestine Laboratory" by Anthony Loewenstein
  • It’s even worse, because they would have to say: “the bomb dropped itself because we forgot a screw in the airplane, but see how effective it is!”
  • Shouldn't some of these AI company higher ups be arrested and brought up on Computer Fraud and Abuse charges?

    Any individual running a local LLM that hacked a company would absolutely be held responsible for the LLM's actions, and corporations are, as Mitt Romney likes to say, people.

  • it's fiction, that's why.
  • > Any individual running a local LLM that hacked a company would absolutely be held responsible for the LLM's actions

    What if he could present evidence that he didn't tell AI to do it? Is it reckless negligence to give any AI agent access to the internet or even not prevent it 100% from gaining it? Because millions are doing it daily. Pretty much everybody who's doing anything with AI agents.