Join the discussion
Write your take first — we'll ask for email only when you're ready to publish.
- Hacker News
- Yes some of us are having a hard time with it.
All of the years we've spent on immutable by default, strong types and dreaming about the lambda has to matter! The AI that just rips out thousands of lines an hour of imperative and weakly typed code just has to be leading organizations to ruin! You'll see!
We worked hard at honing our craft. It's still meaningful, damnit!
by mbac32768 - no not at all,AI works extremely well with this modeby beanjuiceII
- Your premise is not matching my experience at all.
I know Haskell but use C++ as my daily tool. And I do care deeply about code quality because I don't want to spend most of my time fixing bugs.
- > since functional programmers pride themselves on the elegance of their code while programmers using hybrid languages just want to get the code working
Says who?
by dcminter - “Upset” is not quite the right word - something more like “skeptical”, maybe? It does seem like AI programming tends to create the kind of problems that tend to push programmers toward functional programming.by fwlr
- I don't think functional programmers are necessarily more upset about AI being good at coding. If anything, FP tends to emphasize concepts that AI is already quite good at manipulating: composability, immutability, pure functions, and well-defined abstractions.
- I think the premise is mostly wrong, and it confuses functional programming with aesthetic programming.by markfsharp
- The topic paragraph and comments indicate you already have your own conclusion to this question. If you already have an answer to your own question then why ask in the first place? This sounds like cognitive conservatism in search of support.