Birbla

Join the discussion

Write your take first — we'll ask for email only when you're ready to publish.

Sign in
  • Hacker News
  • so sad. so desperate. nothing worse than a tech tard
    by heyaco
  • ECcouncil ADP frameworks
    by kharma414
  • Yeah, no, just use K3. I’m a member of this and it’s still a pain for some specific for and the output is on par with K3 which has so far been a breeze to work with.

    Not to mention the price is slightly better per task.

    by ofjcihen
  • I like this because it levels the spying gap between the US and China. With Red the CIA can probably penetrate some Chinese government sites.
    by dash2
  • https://lifearchitect.ai/models-table/
    by adt
  • If you want freedom, use a model which anyone can use, not this access-restricted horror show. You will thank yourself later, such as when you change jobs.
    by OutOfHere
  • The requirement for hardware security keys ties the use of these models even tighter to a specific identity.

    This will limit ability to scale or share the model.

    by intern4tional
  • Well if u think about it. do we not go to college and pay to learn skills right? It is the same thing correct licening to obtain information that we are certified for. Instead just a free range of whatever we want. then there would be no regulation. Plus think about if the right information falls into the wrong hands. This is why the need for limitations. it is thus balanced to use Ai as more of a certified assisstant rather then just take over our jobs or careers.
    by kharma414
  • I guess Daybreak Blue is their attempt to fix the problem of Hugging Face getting iced out of being able to analyze the AI slopsploit attack chain they got hit with? I'm still not happy with putting defensive capabilities behind any sort of identification wall - mostly because when I'm inevitably 0wned by a misaligned[0] AI, I'm almost certainly not going to be granted access to these programs as I'm an un-sueable nobody.

    Also, if I did have access, I'd use it to jailbreak my iPad, which is probably considered an unauthorized / unsafe use.

    [0] Some guy in Australia's OpenClaw just hacked their gym

    by kmeisthax
  • The program existed under a different name well before the Hugging Face incident. Hugging Face certainly would have qualified for admission. They just didn't bother to apply.
    by ameliaquining
  • > Some guy in Australia's OpenClaw just hacked their gym

    Whoa, you weren't kidding.

    https://techcrunch.com/2026/08/10/tech-industry-is-buzzing-a...

    Edit: looks like it happened a few months ago:

    > The OpenClaw owner, Andrew Bird, published a now-deleted blog post about it on his company’s website on April 10, according to a copy still visible on the Internet Archive.

    by javawizard
  • These “safeguards” aren’t guarding anything tho, just yesterday I was pentesting something and 5.6 sol initially said that it can’t do xyz, I added 2 words at the end and it proceeded like it was nothing, follow up prompts I didn’t even add anything it just assumed and carried on normally.
    by tamimio
  • The constant interruptions and "can't show this content" are extremely annoying though.
    by matheusmoreira
  • Just go online rent a few servers, download K3, ablate it, run the thing, shut it down. Will probably cost a few hundreds bucks to ablate, but f* this non-sense paternalistic sh*.

    I wish i had the time to do it and blog it, "in your face" kinda style.

    by _davide_
  • FYI:

    There have been reports of much smaller qwen derivatives being used for 0day research.

    by throwa356262
  • Great, the start of model segmentation where I'm gonna need a legal license to ask about legal problems, a nutritionist license to create a meal plan, a medical license to ask about an x-ray, a pilots license to ask about a flight plan, be a registered electrician to ask how to wire something, etc etc. The licensing of allowed thoughts.

    Apparently I can pay for partial solutions to the Riemann hypothesis but if my question involves a crackme or something that is an existential risk somehow.

    by xyzzy123
  • +1. And these ^^^ are exactly my thoughts for which I had been downvoted to oblivion before. TaDa. They materialise.
    by RealWed5
  • Just today, 5.6-sol refused to elaborate on a security vulnerability it claimed it had identified in my code. It could plainly see the git history with my name on every commit going back to inception, but apparently elaborating on the nature of a purported vulnerability is too scary for openai.

    It would fix it for me, automatically, if I was willing to let it run amok in my codebase. But asking if the "vuln" was exploitable triggered the guardrails and a "we can't show you this content" error because I am not part of the cybersecurty Trusted Access bullshit.

    by stackghost
  • The frontier labs would rather charge a premium for the best capabilities. You joke but they will probably soon have a GPT-bio that they license to Pfizer and a GPT-quant that they license to Citadel, rather than keeping those valuable capabilities in the public models.
    by pants2
  • It's the open weight models that will save us from this fate.

    OTOH, this is the cudgel that incumbents will use to get the government to protect them from open weight models.

    by bryanlarsen