Join the discussion
Write your take first — we'll ask for email only when you're ready to publish.
- Hacker News
- There is an interesting tell, they sent the old presidential plane. But then Trump flew onwards from England on the new one. The two planes are sufficiently different that they can't be mistaken for one another.by GianFabien
- Was it serving oreja de cerdo?by tengbretson
- I don’t know what Iran expected for trying to assassinate Trump back in 2024: https://www.nbcnews.com/investigations/iran-assassination-pl.... Of all the people who weren’t just going to let that slide. Maybe they thought he wouldn’t win?by rayiner
- Remember this administration never passes up a lie about anything when the truth would do. There is no credibility.by hyperhello
- If true, this is really embarrassing. Have security standards really fallen that far, that we can't protect the US president in a more dignified way? That this story is even out there at all is an embarrassing low point for US competence and security. Amidst a ton of other incompetence and general displays of weakness from the US.by epistasis
- TFA says Clinton did something similar. I'm sure it happens more than we're told. The Secret Service is paid to be paranoid. Decoy flights and vehicles are out of the standard playbook.by SoftTalker
- You’re joking, right?
This was a preemptive security move, and the president is still alive. Crazy people have tried to kill Trump multiple times already. Every minute of every day must be guarded, especially as the president travels.
The Secret Service is rising to the biggest challenge it’s ever had, and thus far it is succeeding.
by RickJWagner - Is it, though? It was highly effective with basically zero downsides, and well executed. I’m honestly not sure what the problem is.by D13Fd
- The Secret Service has a lot more to be embarrassed about in its recent history than this decoy maneuver, which seems to have been executed fairly well. And I really doubt it was a “cart” - it was probably the room sized catering containers that trucks lift up to the side of the plane.by fiatpandas
- Presidential security is a fascinating topic. See also the presidential motorcade's operating procedures: https://people.howstuffworks.com/presidential-motorcade.htmby LorenDB
- > When asked later by reporters why they had to keep their shades shut during the [decoy] flight, Trump said it was because they were “probably on a dangerous flight”. He went onto say: “But if I go, you go. Right?”
Is that... "go" as in travel, or "go" as in die alongside the Pharaoh in his tomb?
by Terr_ - DIE is cast.by Hacker_Yogi
- I assume it's "as in travel". Sounds like the usual Trump ego thing. "It's dangerous, but I know you have to follow me because that's your job to report on what I'm doing, so now you're in danger."by gwerbin
- It’s more clearly meant as “die” given the quote used by the NY Times:
> “I’m number one on their list, before you,” he told the reporters. “But if I go, you go. Right?”
by fiatpandas - Hopefully the catering truck was full of cheeseburgers, he must have been so happy :Dby orwin
- Why does everyone involved in this seem so keen to talk about it?by yread
- Why would they admit all this?by Miserlou57
- The President may well consider this some kind of daring exploit, and is proud of it. The article suggests that he was playing up the danger beforehand.by jfengel
- Probably because they used a secret third method and don't want anyone to know.by bentcorner
- Echoes of Nissan CEO Carlos Ghosn smuggling himself from Japan in a music equipment box while on bail for financial crimesby adamjb
- So all the news outlets are crowing about the old and the new "Air Force One", but security/aviation wonks all know that "Air Force One" (and "Marine One") is a callsign, not an aircraft designation.
So if the President snuck into a smaller decoy aircraft, what callsign did these planes use? Does "Air Force One" keep up the ruse over the radio as well? If this is the case, and considering how difficult it is to keep secrets secret, then how large of a circle needs to be "read in" about the true situation, in order to protect the right aircraft? What contingencies do they have if one of them is actually attacked... keep up the ruse?
Yes, I admit, we've all seen too many action/adventure films with complex decoy scenarios. It would seem that doing them in real life would just induce headaches.
Also, my father is totally convinced that Qatar loaded-up the new aircraft with bugs and surprises, and they won't in a hundred years sweep them all clean. I feel like maybe Qatar wouldn't be that nakedly stupid. I mean, the Russians were really coy about their gift of The Thing!
- If you do an ADSB playback the C-32 was flying as SAM112 In trail of AF1
https://globe.adsbexchange.com/?replay=2026-07-08-21:06&icao...
by dingaling - That must have been a rather large cart.
- It was, in fact the article also refers to it as a catering truck.by leereeves