Join the discussion

Write your take first — we'll ask for email only when you're ready to publish.

  • Hacker News
  • Eeeesh. Mozilla, wake up to build and signing processes from 20 years ago, please. Don't embarrass yourselves like this.
  • It is insane that this key is not kept in a HSM.

    It would be good if there way a way to attest that a key was generated on and bound to a specific HSM.

  • Isn't this the sort of thing TUF[1] was invented to combat ?

    [1]https://theupdateframework.io/

  • And this is why Microsoft requires signing keys to live in hardware for signing code.
  • I’m surprised that the signing key lives on a non-airgapped system. A sophisticated attacker won’t be leaving any traces.
  • If the signing subkey was committed, that implies developers have it as a file on their system which I find surprising if true. They should be using hardware like a Yubikey or something. Especially for something this important.

Explore Birbla archives