Join the discussion
Write your take first — we'll ask for email only when you're ready to publish.
- Hacker News
- a mystery “model 2” is mentioned alongside mythos/fable.by visiondude
- Does anybody have any good reading on how the Chinese labs approach risk vs. the American ones?by int32_64
- It's crazy how Anthropic talks so much about their "AGI risk" and not enough about the risk of bankruptcy.by _ache_
- "all traffic through our systems for collecting human feedback data from contractors evaluating our models ran without blocking biological classifiers"
"totaled around 133M exchanges."
While this wound up being relatively benign, I still find this concerning, amidst numerous sandbox escapes, and previously, unreleased models being accessible via a custom URL. I don't think these companies are giving the responsibility they possess enough weight. How many more issues like this exist?
by internetter - AI companies are flooding the zone like Steve Bannon. Leave no one time to develop thoughts.by 12ahGA
- So as of a month ago their best internal model was "somewhat more capable" than Mythos "but does not display a capability jump of the degree observed from Claude Opus 4.6 to Mythos Preview." I thought they would have a significantly more capable model by then, more than five months after Mythos finished training. They'd better have one by now, or the Chinese competitors are closer to catching up than I thought.by modeless
- "We believe our internal AI R&D efforts are significantly faster than they would be without AI assistance, but not yet by a factor of 2 (though we are uncertain and measurement is difficult)"
So Anthropic thinks their productivity is not even doubled by AI. Interesting data point.