Join the discussion

Write your take first — we'll ask for email only when you're ready to publish.

  • Hacker News
  • Are patents a necessary evil?
  • Software patents, no. They're just evil.
  • I used to think they were entirely useless, but since then I've learned of many instances where a much better technology is developed because the first iteration is patented.

    For example, the Wright brothers biggest contribution to aviation was suing everyone using wing warping (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wright_brothers_patent_war) which greatly advanced the adoption of the much more advanced ailerons.

    Software patents have a similar effect, for example Cisco's patent on Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol led to the development of the more secure and more capable Common Address Redundancy Protocol (https://jacobfilipp.com/DrDobbs/articles/SA/v14/i05/a6.htm).

    We tend to invest heavily in whatever we can get working first, but it's rarely close to an ideal way of doing something. By pushing every developer to find a newer, better way of doing something, patents prevent stagnation and lead to more advanced technologies.

  • Discussion on the news in July: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48969635
A 25-year-old video patent just expired, ending a legal headache for Linux · Birbla