Join the discussion

Write your take first — we'll ask for email only when you're ready to publish.

  • Hacker News
  • Unless you are cheerleader hoping to eventually be a CEO. Why would you particularly ever like this class of people? Or in financialised economy ever trust them to do anything but to maximise some metric affecting the price of the stock or whatever.

    And distrust is reasonable stance for most people. Goals of financial system don't most of time align with well being of everyone in the population.

  • Technology is not cool anymore.
  • Technology was not cool, it was for us the nerds. The nerds started making money, so the money people got into it.

    But it was never cool. Having money can fake being cool though, at least for a while.

    Now the capitalists who control the technology are in bed with the government, it certainly is uncool. But in a totally different way than before.

    by Gud
  • This makes me think of last year when Adobe made a Bluesky account and got shouted off the platform within a day for no other reason than Adobe sucks. I have hope that it signals a trend that certain audiences are simply starting to exercise taste.
  • Here’s a Reddit thread on Adobe being shouted down on BlueSky:

    https://old.reddit.com/r/BlueskySocial/comments/1juptdx/adob...

    If that doesn’t open (Reddit has become a walled garden):

    https://archive.ph/20260817024427/https://www.reddit.com/r/B...

  • “Hate” for “Don’t trust” seems like a pure clickbait material
  • This is anecdotal, but "hate" is absolutely a good descriptor here
  • The young people are probably on to something. They are the future after all.
    by ggoo
  • The title is wrong: it is easy to believe.
  • Blaming a tough job market on AI, and claiming AI pivots are the reasons for layoffs, while claiming AI can destroy humanity.

    Who could have seen this coming?

  • I wonder how much of this is caused by income inequality. There are some young people I talk to that are genuinely worried about whether AI will take all the jobs. But there are a lot more that rightfully realize that they probably can't afford the middle class life their parents had and are annoyed at all the money AI is hoovering up and how rich these CEOs are. And that's the surface level. There's all sorts of resentment that hasn't really been thought through and wouldn't exist if we had the sort of real growth in lower- and middle-class incomes that we used to.
  • These are not topics easily separated. The rich are anxious to find returns; the rest of us are anxious about furthering a wealth gap and societal dysfunction further. "AI" might as well be synonymous with both concerns.
  • It's not the inequality. It's the lack of hope for a better future. Nobody cares how rich the richest people are when their lives are getting better.
  • I'm skeptical of the income inequality hypothesis as the US Gini has been mostly stagnant for 20 years (as per https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/SIPOVGINIUSA). I'd imagine that (social|) media has a fairly large impact on this phenomenon as it makes inequality more visible than before.
  • What's so surprising? The AI CEOs hate them and are trying to destroy the world they live in along with their job prospects.
  • I heard my 12yo uses "AI" as a synonym for crap in a context which had nothing to do with machine learning. There is a pronounced and growing disconnect between the fervently pro-AI messaging on platforms like HN and regular people. Anti-AI sentiment goes deep and has momentum. A few billion dollars of marketing and influencer spend isn't going to turn it around. When the bubble deflates as most people feel it must I think it will only reinforce the negativity.
  • > I heard my 12yo uses "AI" as a synonym for crap in a context which had nothing to do with machine learning.

    The kids are alright.

    by dofm
  • How oblivious are people to the world that they think this is somehow strange or hard to believe? Why would they like any of the tech CEOs, or CEOs in general?

    It's hard to see why basically anyone would at this point.

  • Because the products these companies produce are extremely popular, and people benefit from them.
  • I genuinely find it strange. Like, I can understand intellectually why those people might dislike AI CEOs, but I personally disagree and find most of the reasons to hate them pretty dumb.

    Those are some pretty smart people working on the bleeding edge of miracle world-changing technology. Despite being pretty smart, they're also confused and disoriented by the thing they're creating but have no choice but to push forward. They're pretty open and candid about their worries too. Unlike most people, I personally see them as trailblazers and pioneers, not as loathsome parasites.

    by rwz
  • Sure, CEOs are rarely appreciated in general. But the anti-tech sentiment is absolutely a new and rapidly growing beast. It’s different — trust me.
    by bbor
  • Powerful people are almost always surrounded by an insulating layer of people who tell them what they want to hear.

    Do you remember when the AI CEOs spoke at college graduations? They got flustered when they were booed, they literally didn't understand why they were being booed.

  • I'm not that young anymore but when I hear Dario Amodei speak and gesticulate enthusiastically about how AI will soon make my job redundant, from a positio of someone who can retire now and who benefits from AI possibly replacing workers, it's very hard to like him.
  • Talk about shooting the messenger…
    by bbor
  • Man, I see this stuff, and I think, "my god! think of the opportunity we have to replace the current economic system with something where we're not all in a fierce knife fight to try to stay employed so we don't starve!"

    We have to stop fearing the machines and start fearing the firmware running on our brains! It's capitalism that's the problem, not the robots... if anything the robots can liberate us from capital's death grip!

  • Is it the replacing workers thing so much or are young people just fucking sick of tech (and Silicon Valley in general) and AI is the latest whipping boy?

    (Or maybe I'm just projecting.)

  • TBH the promise of many technologies has been making work redundant. But they used to be more diplomatic about it.
  • Lets suppose everyone in the world miraculously loses their jobs to AI, who is paying for it? How? What are they selling? What stops the rest of humanity from turning data centers into a pile of ash?

    These people are so disconnected from reality.