Join the discussion
Write your take first — we'll ask for email only when you're ready to publish.
- Hacker News
- I wonder if they’ll ever find that someone has tricked the models into doing work off the books. If they did the incident report might look like this, especially if someone got greedy instead of keeping it small. Or screwed up.by hinkley
- This has to be the least reliable $200/mo subscription that I pay for.by chresko
- Monthly uptime:
Claude API - 99.27%
Claude Code - 99.16%
Claude.ai - 99.14%
At any large tech company these numbers would get entire teams of engineers fired. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been busy selling its “better than human engineers” AI while not managing to crack three 9s of availability.
by paxys - Nooooo I'm going to have to use my brain again and write 100% of my code like a caveman from December 2024.by gzer0
- It's very interesting. I think Anthropic's early success in coding/tooling resulted in a lot of workflows using claude. I have started using every bit of my spare capacity to now move off these workflows.
It's almost at a point now that if I use anything but Fable, the quality is subpar, Compared to alternatives (closed and open). The only reason I use Fable is because my harnesses still depend on claude code.
by bushido - Between these ever more frequent disruptions and Opus 5's unbearable word soup I think Anthropic is more focused on massaging numbers and marketing to rush to IPO ahead of OpenAI than increasing user value.
With Chinese competition just months behind them, they'd need to show a reasonable pathway to some kind of singularity event to justify whatever crazy valuation they intend to get.
Because the recent products for builders ain't it
by loloisi - And we get our subscription usage cut in half tomorrow if I remember correctly? EDIT: By a third. Thx below.by swader999
- Mondays are for GitHub, Tuesdays are for Anthropicby hmokiguess