Join the discussion

Write your take first — we'll ask for email only when you're ready to publish.

  • Hacker News
  • Of course, isn’t Andreessen the one who believes introspection is a waste of time, a fad from the 1900s the only outcome of which is to slow one down? Why even consider the long term consequences of your actions when they can make you billions of dollars in the short term? Introspection, like empathy, is for suckers and losers.
  • Yeah really

    How do people like him get the money to fund his little projects, it's amazing

  • I remember reading about Andreessen coaching Zuckerberg, having to spoon feed him answers at trial, and apparently he was one of the masterminds behind the dual class shares/proposed third class of share

    (I mean that Zuckerberg apparently understood nothing. I mean when I say, 'spoon feed')

    This is the same man who came out and said Snowden is a traitor. Now, I've since heard other versions on this so I'm willing to entertain the arguments. But a top VC being like he is, well, it's concerning. It's concerning he chooses what to fund

  • Not surprised at all as Marc Andreesen has been in the rabbit hole for a while: https://www.semafor.com/article/04/27/2025/the-group-chats-t...
  • He also organized/hosted a reading club for discussing Evola, the fascist/nazi occultist.
  • I think this is a symptom of Big Tech and VCs scraping the bottom of the barrel to extract as much capital and social control from what remains of the good will for technology as a whole. They are literally running the internet into the ground. The popular backlash is brewing. I see this in increasing opposition to flock cameras, anti data-center activism, or generally against companies that extract, exploit and control instead of contributing to the common good.
  • This is just one of the things turning China into a relatively less dangerous and harmful trading partner. I've often wondered aloud how the US tech industry is going to deal with losing international markets, which have historically been half their sales in mature product categories.

    Investors might be attracted to the bleak future they are selling, but they are selling a shrinking share of the world economy.

    I can think of one way to explain it, and it's not good: they expect global war.

  • They're just silently waiting. No need to make a big show, just simply being the best alternative is enough of a pitch.
  • > they expect global war

    Based on the recent performance of the US and Russia, there is likely no "global" war. China might take out Taiwan and that will be that. Everyone else will just go/stay home.

  • On one hand, VCs that fund thousands of early-stage startups are inevitably going to fund some bad stuff, even if they try hard to avoid it.

    On the other, the older I get the more I worry about the decline of spirituality in the West. Especially in tech, I sometimes feel like I’m living in a hyper rational snowglobe of people optimizing a local maxima, not even considering (and often looking down on) the possibility that there are larger, more important games to play.

  • These same VCs have been pushing spirituality on the US via socially conservative politics. It's highly possible that they are only instrumentalizing a value system that they don't really personally buy into, but their strategy does beg a lot of questions. One of which is what role spirituality can actually play in helping here.

    For example, Peter Thiel has gone out of his way to give something like sermons on "the anti-christ". At the same time, he hesitates when asked if the human race should survive. What's happening there?

    Maybe it's not enough to just have values. Maybe they need to be a particular kind of values. Which is probably implicit in what you meant. I just think it's worth pointing out that a concept like spirituality itself doesn't necessarily mean "good" or pro-social.

    To put it bluntly, weren't the people who sacrificed children to Moloc technically "spiritual"?

  • > even if they try hard to avoid it.

    The thing is: a16z isn't even trying to avoid it, they are intentionally looking for questionable startups and cultivate a controversial reputation. They seem to have no moral filter whatsoever.

    https://www.businessinsider.com/marc-andreessen-controversia...

  • Don’t forget a16z’s breathless boosterism of NFTs and Crypto.

    They really are the gift that keeps on giving.

  • They really are the grift that keeps on giving.
  • Marc Andreessen is an evil man with the behavior (and appearance!) of a Bond villain.
  • I enjoy telling recruiters I won’t work for companies funded by obvious sociopaths.
  • Had to google his name. Welcome to the Egghead's lair, Mr. Bond.
  • I have you now, Mr. Bond. But instead of quickly disposing of you, I shall spend a 20 minute monologue on How We Must Build Things while you inexorably escape
  • He's the embodiment of the banality of evil. Just can't avoid being cliché.
  • How come Flock is not listed? That’s the most troubling company a16z has heavily invested on and supported.
  • Yeah strange how this article is almost entirely focused on consumer apps. These examples might be unhealthy for society, but mostly represent (poor) choices for consumers. Digital cigarettes.

    Surveillance tech is the opposite: It represents freedom taken away. That is the more bleak future IMO.

  • Hard to say Flock is the worst... There's a lot of competition. I'll throw Toka into the ring.

    https://www.techspot.com/news/113395-flock-biggest-investor-...

  • > Lee's stated goal was to “desensitize everyone to the phrase ‘cheating.’” If you say it enough, he argues, “cheat begins to lose its meaning.” A16z praised Lee's approach as “rooted in deliberate strategy and intentionality.”

    Investors: but surely they won't cheat me!

  • I'm tired of cheats.
  • Lee is a product of his environment. Tech interviews are bullshit and he exposed it. School work is mostly bullshit and he exposed it.

    How can you honestly tell this young man not to cheat and get ahead when the president does it regularly? We’re a spiritually dead country and the youth is reflecting it. Don’t use Lee as the scapegoat.

  • society is a coordination problem which involves costly cooperation of individuals to gain surplus for society as a whole, when selfish defection is advantageous.

    being largely ethical and being ruled is so baked into the identity of a citizen that we do not see mass defection. someone who does defect by being unethical gains and maybe rules others.

    there is no requirement for a cooperative agreement or social contract signed by the leader or plutocrats of a society. they can and do defect by being corrupt.

    more people are realising in the middle class that they too can defect and gain personally at others' expense. for example, realising that not recycling saves time and harms only others, or starting these companies listed in the article.

    the more people that do defect, the less cooperation, which is a social breakdown. under mass defection you have the law of the jungle, which is the existing paradigm of marc andreessen and peers, they are sociopathic.

    this is all to say that A16Z can cheat in the knowledge that only comparable competitors will cheat, the people as a whole who are harmed will not.

  • Some of these SV "founder mode" people do speak like sociopaths. It's probably a good base for success in the industry.

    "I don't get it, why are they confessing? They are not confessing. They are bragging"

  • They just need to get out before the next fool gets in.
  • Do they care? Just cheat the people in the next round!
  • Y Combinator's application still asks: "Please tell us about the time you most successfully hacked some (non-computer) system to your advantage." They don't actually use the word "cheat" but that's what they're asking for: Are you willing to cheat if it gives you an advantage?