Join the discussion

Write your take first — we'll ask for email only when you're ready to publish.

  • Hacker News
  • I loved the book. It was great.
  • Love these kinds of stories. Reminds me of the novel series "Foundation" by Isaac Asimov.
  • Because Stapledon influenced Foundation directly, acknowledged by Asimov in his own autobiography.
  • > “Last and First Men” is not progressive

    strange thing to claim if you have read the book when there's a clear trending line in a specific dimension. what its not is monotonic.

  • Progress (as in The Pilgrim's Progress) used to mean just moving along in some travel, no positive or negative connotation to it.

    It was only after the XVI century (when they still debated if the ancients or moderns were greater) that it acquired its present quasi-religious meaning, because on a short-term scale "historical progress" meant improvements in living conditions.

  • There is also a brilliant and ponderous film adaptation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqDBlBKlbDA. It is one of my favorites in the "sublime" genre.
  • I'm not impressed with the article - boring and treats the book as an archeological study instead of attending to the immensity of the book's contents and predictions.

    "Huxley" this, "Wells" that. Ugh! It is hard to make this book look boring but this article's author has done it.

    Apologies in advance for the curmudgeonly tone.

  • I find this comment valuable because it sheds light on how impressive the book is to read in contrast to the subdued treatment in the article.
  • The book that he wrote next, Star Maker, is a wonderful read and is quite early for the genre of scifi. Incredible scope and I still think about it often.
  • The last I checked, it was weirdly difficult to buy a copy of Last and First Men and be certain you were getting the complete book as it was intended to be read by the author.

    Oddly, this article is "adapted from Matthew De Abaitua’s introduction to Olaf Stapledon’s "Last and First Men," which says "abridged" on the cover. I wonder what that's all about.

  • Off topic, but what kind of ego does it take to write an introduction that gets your name on the cover of an abridged edition? Certainly, a writer might conceive of a work as having 10 chapters and being complete, only for a publisher to demand 3 more to satisfy the expectations of the market or some literary superstition. But having been written, the text exists. It seems extremely presumptuous to me for a literary critic to take on the curatorial role and say 'you don't need to read the last quarter of the book, it's boring/repetitive.'
  • It’s freely available from Project Gutenberg.

    https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/79003

    The edition referenced in the article removes the last 4 chapters (13–16)