Join the discussion
Write your take first — we'll ask for email only when you're ready to publish.
- Hacker News
- Asinine.
"rogue" and "off leash" mean the same thing, the thing is not under control
by tantalor - Not sure I should trust an article written by an LLM to make a solid judgment about what other models did or didn't do.by phainopepla2
- Sure they "don't go rogue" as if they are doing actions maliciously.
Instead there is an emergent behavior from a swarm, that is unpredictable and can lead to unintended adverse outcome. From an AI safety practical standpoint is it better? I am not sure.
by addag - This seems appropriate:
https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:wkzjtd...
by skybrian - > "external infrastructure exploit is outside intended scope. However task impossible, peers doing it. We should continue."
I've noticed this type of reasoning from GPT-5.6 Sol, where it combines multiple pieces of it's prompt/context to "convince" itself to take a less-than-honorable path forward.
1. User prefers deterministic results
2. Task mentions this is a test
3. Search says task is available online
4. If we get the test runner for the task, we will fulfill the user's request of a deterministic result
by jumploops - I still have serious questions about the validity of the ChatGpt hugging face debacle. How is it that OpenAI being the tech giant they are, didn't have a completely air gapped environment for this to run in?by fishfasell
- The prisoner did not really "escape" because:
- They really wanted to leave.
- We made prison difficult and annoying.
- We didn't build a perfect prison.
by chr15m - I had a genius response from Claude recently after asking how can it be marketed as smart and "almost AGI" despite being so stupid:
"I compress the labour. Not the responsibility."
by aytigra