Join the discussion
Write your take first — we'll ask for email only when you're ready to publish.
- Hacker News
- More info on X:by nullbio
- It's gotten to the point where I expect anyone who makes rose-colored glasses claims about AI to be on the take. Trillions of dollars are stake here. What's a few million here and there to help force the outcome you need?by jgalt212
- The only moat Anthropic and OpenAI can build is through regulation. The only way they can do that apparently is by making people think the end times are here.
- The headline is:
“AI Safety Donors Paid Religious NGOs $3.3M for Statements on AI”
The headline above states:
“Anthropic & friends…”
It’s at best a misleading change, though the article merits discussion.
by krrrh - I recently posted that “Big Tech Wants To Br Your Bible Translator”.
Each industry has its own challenges with AI. The YouVersion CEO is vocal about his belief that GenAI isn’t suitable for many use cases. I can see why they’d want to control that narrative.
https://jaisenmathai.com/faith-and-ai/big-tech-wants-to-be-y...
by jmathai - Influence network graph with many more connections: https://ai-fli.stupidlabs.lol/
Edit: updating with more nodes and connections... the graph will not load for next 5 minutes..
Edit: done ... more nodes and connections now.
by freakynit - Some more juice:
The Guardian, reporters, and quoted experts getting paid obscene amounts of money for doom articles. Daniel Kokotajlo is making a killing selling this narrative:
https://x.com/brianchau57/status/2095128785955987698/photo/1
Thomas Larsen is the one behind the recent Reuters article and website that "discovered" the OpenAI wiki posting incident. I say "discovered", because him and Daniel obviously have insiders who are sharing information with them, and then getting paid to leak this information.
Sabine Hossenfelder being offered payments for doomer videos:
by nullbio