Join the discussion

Write your take first — we'll ask for email only when you're ready to publish.

  • Hacker News
  • The old map's Africa looks just like Africa on my globe. I understand that the new Africa is bigger, but it no longer looks like the real shape of Africa on planet Earth.

    When I look at a map - political or geographic - my primary observation is the shapes of the nations or landforms. Not the size.

  • Yes, contrary to reporting, the map doesn't represent Africa more accurately, but instead it represents regions near the poles more accurately to eliminate size distortion, at the expense of more shape distortion near the equator. But you aren't going to see many news outlets titling "UN backs new map showing Greenland's true relative size with US alone in opposition."
  • > In a statement after the vote, Yaryna Ferencevych, deputy U.S. representative to the U.N. Economic and Social Council, accused the United Nations of promoting an ideological agenda and distracting from more pressing issues.

    > "Resolutions like this and the ideological agenda they promote, are barnacles on our work here, and the reason this institution is losing its credibility," the statement read.

    I dunno, bro, "more accurate map" seems less "ideological" than "refuse to contemplate anything that could be perceived by the most fragile people alive as diminishing the US."

    Sometimes it gets harder and harder to understand why certain things trigger these children.

  • Is it a more accurate map? It more accurately represents the size of Africa but there are distortions in other places that aren't present in a Mercator projection.
  • They can't hear you over their loud and non-ideological renaming of Lake America.
  • Why don't they use the Mollweide projection instead?
  • Or Collignon!
  • Noted in the linked UN news source:

    > Six countries – Estonia, Georgia, Lithuania, Moldova, Serbia and Ukraine – abstained.

    It would have been interesting if NPR had covered the diplomatic and economic considerations behind those countries abstaining, and no other right-wing nationalist regime siding with the US.

  • Reading the Wikipedia article on the Equal Earth projection it would seem the map used in the resolution indicates national boundaries.
  • I'm neutral on the map. If it makes somebody happy, great.

    Would've been a lot more interesting of they promoted a population map: https://ourworldindata.org/world-population-cartogram

    by xnx
  • > Would've been a lot more interesting of they promoted a population map

    why?