Join the discussion

Write your take first — we'll ask for email only when you're ready to publish.

  • Hacker News
  • Looks like hand coded. Kudos for that!
  • Not sure how you could tell that - the entire repo is 4 commits, all within the last 4 hours.
  • A dead giveaway that I think it's AI-made (not necessarily a con) is the complexity of the UI and redundant information. Things like the green dot paired with "interface is up". It looks polished though.
  • Nice work, following along.
  • Any notable differences from wg-easy?
  • Just a big one: it can manage an already existing WG setup. The readme says it all.
  • Seems like high-risk and low-reward for your network security. You could host it behind the WG interface, but… still exposing the castle’s master key to a python web app.

    I have found that WG client management is as simple as a couple scripts and a TSV file to match pubkeys to users.

    Anyhow, cool project and I like the overall concept of respecting existing config.

  • Well, I don't rely on tools to deliver security out of the box without me knowing what is all about. Therefore, this tool is not meant to be secure by itself. I use other means to achieve that.
Wg-admin – web UI for an existing WireGuard host · Birbla