Join the discussion

Write your take first — we'll ask for email only when you're ready to publish.

  • Hacker News
  • Actual luddite: prevent capitalists from using technology to destroy society.

    Meme luddite: hate technology

  • Amish luddite. Technology is vetted by a central committee before the public is allowed to use it.
  • normie: Loves to walk on technologically advanced crutches when they have perfectly working legs...
  • Your “actual Luddite” characterisation is just as much a meme.

    Both are stupid misrepresentations of the movement.

  • They didn't prevent a damn thing though and neither will this new crop of people.
  • Actual Luddite: your employees who are going through layoffs while your profits are rising.

    Luddite according to the boss: somebody who is trying to prevent me from doing what I want to do when I want to do it just because there's 100 of them and one of me.

    The boss owns the printing press.

  • I remember reading about how the Amish operate. We treat them as a quaint, anti-progress cult of sorts, but they have a process where they consider new technologies and determine if they are worth adopting or not. Obviously the answer is "no" most of the time, but the pattern of considering and embracing new technologies through a communal, forward-thinking process seems like a reasonable way to counter the velocity and unintended consequences of rapid progress.

    Of course, for this to make any sense it would need to be a global process, which seems entirely unfeasible until we've already badly burnt our hand on the stove. That seems to be precisely where we are in the process.

    The best path forward may be cataclysmic societal collapse that leaves just enough knowledge to rebuild carefully with newfound wisdom. But wisdom is a rare and unlikely commodity. More probable is a dark age where technology is akin to witchcraft.

    We've had our chances to stop burning coal and save the Earth, and we don't seem to be capable of that right now as a species. Maybe the better path is if we acknowledge our lack and "vibe submit" to our AI overlords, since we can't overcome ourselves in any direct way.

  • This word has lost any meaning, if anything the current anti-tech wave is far closer to Amish views (subjective vetoing of new tech to avoid centralization and preserve the way of life) than to historical Luddism.
  • For rethinking the Luddite movement I recommend the book Blood in the Machine (I think I learned about it here on HN)
  • The term luddite is like the term pharisee. It's a pejorative removed from it's historical context. Actual Luddites and Pharisees would have not agreed that they were against technology or legalistic hypocrites, even though their critics tried to paint them with that brush.
  • > It's a pejorative removed from it's historical context.

    It utterly depends on historical context. Intelligent people understand antonomasia and eponymy.

    > Actual Luddites and Pharisees would have not agreed that they were against technology or legalistic hypocrites

    That's neither here nor there.

  • What I find interesting is how the tone seems to have changed in swathes of tech industry. Until LLMs were a thing, techno-optimism and sola technologia fundamentalism seems to have been a more prominent fetish. When LLMs began having a practical and tangible effect, much of the same cohort seems to have pivoted toward aversion. If this is true—and this perception could be an artifact of selection bias driven by those with the loudest voices, though I strongly suspect it is not that entirely—then it cannot be denied how self-serving it is. Sure, we can automate away all sorts of jobs, confident that our own is the only constant and the one thing that would survive automation. But then, the cunning of reality cut down that hubris.

    Of course, I do think technology ought to be adopted with prudence and wisdom. We must always remember the purpose of technology which is serving the objective human good, but to be able to do that requires more than narrow technical savvy. You need a wise and substantive grasp of the broader context within which technology is located.

  • I would argue the decline of techno-optimism started long before LLMs became widespread. If you think back to the late 2010s, the first bricks were starting to fall already (Cambridge analytica, Google’s 2018 … thing). Crypto, NFTs, Web3, etc were held with general negative regard in the beginning of the 2020s, and the tech CEOs like Musk/Zuckerberg/Bezos had all accumulated negative image by then.
  • Unfortunately I imagine your modern AI data centre has better security than a 19th century textile mill.
  • Unfortunately? Are we really at the point of supporting terrorism of the “correct” political persuasion?
  • In the true sense where you're militarizing and committing acts of sabotage on others' property (so-called "monkeywrenching")? And then, getting suppressed and eradicated/killed by the government?

    No.

    I prefer the "Calm Technology"[1] approach as espoused by Amber Case[2]. I think this is the saner path forward.

    1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calm_technology

    2. https://a.co/d/02kdlV3p

  • My kind of Renaissance. Sign me up!
  • What are some of your favorite devices/software that follow this idea? I can list mine:

    - Supernote by Ratta https://supernote.com

    - Air Lab by Networked Artifacts https://networkedartifacts.com

    - Xteink X4 (or equivalent) https://www.xteink.com

    - Zeroink Writer - my kids use it to practice typing and write letters I can print out. Essentially digital typewriter. https://www.crowdsupply.com/zerowriter/zerowriter-ink

    - Readwise - enables me to review highlighted passages and ideas from things I read

    - Obsidian - I dump text files into it, it syncs it around for me to review or edit.