Join the discussion
Write your take first — we'll ask for email only when you're ready to publish.
- Hacker News
- The jump from a simple scale instruction to 140 micro-instructions makes the special-case machinery much more concrete.by finn888
- I remember getting a 80387 chip for my Compaq 386/20. It has the same size package as the CPU! Now that makes a bit more sense.by Loren_SL
- Author here for your 8087 questions...by kens
- x87 is such a weird architecture. It was designed the same way you'd design a chip for a scientific calculator. Heck, It's almost a perfect fit for an HP RPN calculator.
But for a compiler to target, it's just so painful. It's so different from almost all other ways CPUs work. There's a reason both CPU and compilers prefer to avoid x87 when possible and use regular SIMD (SSE/AVX) instead.
Also, the arbitrary "Oh, and the registers are 80 bits wide" is also just one of those weird "Where did that number come from?".
by cogman10 - 100x speed improvement of math operations by 8087 is not an overestimation. The difference for apps relying on math was crazy back then. I experienced this first-hand on my 80286 machine, where it was 3-second vs 300-second calculation results.
One neat feature of 8087 instruction set is that it can be interspersed with x86 instructions in the code stream, giving you a simultaneous access to two processor chips working in parallel. This combo forms a real asymmetrical multi-processor system with certain opportunities for hardware-assisted code parallelization. If a thoughtful instruction scheduling is used, floating operations executed by 8087 work in parallel with the usual integer x86 code.
by garganzol