Join the discussion
Write your take first — we'll ask for email only when you're ready to publish.
- Hacker News
- ...It's just a generic bland error page?by tosti
- They dont understand socialism or lie on purposeby peter-m80
- The socialism one seems to be in bad faith, like not even trying to be in line with how socialism would explain it analogously to the others.by mint5
- This was a nice refresh of my economies classes.by esalman
- All bases covered but only one of these is "correct"
>Game theory info By not viewing this page you help everyone else get better pages.
by sans_souse - I'd blame it on liquidity trap. Technology team decided to keep money instead of using it to fix the issue.by esalman
- Their request IDs seem to be chronological when sorted alphabetically.by laurensr
- This took me back nearly fifty years to my Econ classes, and I have been re-traumatized.by themadturk
- for more: https://www.404s.design/ - gallery of 404 page designs
- Dislike that textual noise filling the blanks since empty space is the best indicator of nothing. Also happens with various search engines slapping full-page animations visually tricking you into thinking you've got the fish
This should just be a single phrase
by eviks - I wonder why they chose this description for Pareto inefficiency:
Instead of the correctThere exists another page that will make everyone better off without making anyone worse off.
Makes me wonder if all the descriptions I know less about are all subtly wrong on purpose.There exists another page that will make someone better off without making anyone worse off.by Epa095 - I think this is just a tongue in cheek description, implying that "nobody needs this page and the `other one` makes everybody happy".
- Nice catch and a nice reminder of the quality control fails with broken feedback mechanisms, a common state of affairs! (what, you think they "asked some leading economists."?)by eviks