Join the discussion
Write your take first — we'll ask for email only when you're ready to publish.
- Hacker News
- As of now, AI annihilating whole humanity is pretty much fear mongering to sell IPO. But we might reach there where their capabilities are advanced enough to create threats that can be concerning. I think that's 20-50 years timeframe, it might be early or late. All depends on development speed.by rahuljha0403
- >but it needs the right architecture. Architecture it key.
Can you make EM radiation with an LLM with right Architecture? If not why do people say things like this?
by lolakutty - Come on dude. IF you want to spend your time compiling things ppl have to be afraid about then start with Covid. It killed 7 million people. No intelligence required. No massive energy requirement. No daily interviews saying be afraid of me, be afraid of me,by hgu63
- Dr. Ford from west world has some good ideas.by Sateeshm
- This isn't a place for hosting your blog posts. Instead why not put this on an external site, expand on it a bit, and submit a link? Thats how HN works.by andyjohnson0
- the no real time learning part is still weird to me u can talk to a model for hours and it doesnt actually become smarter from that convo
- Modern AI is still far from what could be called intelligence. But I think that one day this, too, will be created; the only question is whenby ironqcold
- My thought on AI annihilating us all because of misalignment: it's a fantasy from a bunch of weird guys from the Silicon Valley that ought to go outside a bit more, spammed and relayed to everyone as is by the uncritical media.
Can we stop with this bullshit already, so we can focus on the real issues, like it requiring way too much resources or posing a huge risk on the stability of the global economy?
by jraph