Join the discussion
Write your take first — we'll ask for email only when you're ready to publish.
- Hacker News
- Further evidence that Flatpack does not solve the problem of distributing applications.by graemep
- > The problem is structural
> The policy is asymmetric, and that's what makes it harmful.
Well I found the problem already
- Why should Flathub accept vibecoded shit. You don't let just anyone who rings the doorbell into your house, either.by krater23
- Well, there is still AppImage, this might be the right way to go with in this case.by wildredkraut
- BASED. I'm going to feel a lot better about getting software from Flathub from now on.by 6yyyyyy
- > One shared that they were flagged for using Claude Code to submit the pull request, not to write the app.
Who is opening up an LLM to run git push?!
by sgarland - > But the policy doesn't distinguish between someone who prompted an LLM to generate an entire app in five minutes and a developer who used Copilot for autocomplete while writing 90% of the code themselves.
How is using autocomplete "Vibecoding" now? I remember y'all that the "definition" for vibecoding requires the "prompter" to not look at a single line of code
by Muhammad523 - Sure it's not a crime but I don't want your vibe-coded shit mingling with my actual code written by actual humans.by jefurii