Join the discussion

Write your take first — we'll ask for email only when you're ready to publish.

  • Hacker News
  • the psychology is more like they are trusting THEIR ai , and are having a bit of a problem with boundrys and then accepting when it's wrong. peer groups of one, if you will. the wide variety of failure modes is ripe for a whole new genre of opocaliptic end times storys, and of course real life bad shit. I can feel my face is carrying something beween a snear and a grimace thinking about the idea of building a society of helpless psuedo privilaged know nothings, but smiling now thinking they are soft AND crunchy, and good with barbeque sauce.
  • As it should be. The average person believes in wild conspiracy theories. Ai keeps people grounded.
  • Kind of doesn't say or mean anything

    Imagine in contrast an assertion that half of young people would trust a random human off the street for fact-checking (you'd have no idea if they have reliable abilities)

  • Why does this article not have its author(s) listed?
  • If the AI is drawing from multiple sources, I can understand the logic

Explore Birbla archives

Nearly half of young people trust AI over a human for fact-checking, report says · Birbla