Join the discussion

Write your take first — we'll ask for email only when you're ready to publish.

  • Hacker News
  • I feel like this they're deliberately framing it this way to lay a trap for the courts, because accepting this framing doesn't really seem to leave a whole lot of legal wiggle room. After all, legally speaking, what is it exactly, if not a privilege? If it's a right, then basically any citizen should be allowed in, subject to fair/non-discriminatory constraints, like capacity... is/should that be the case? If it's neither then what is it?
  • What's crazy is when asked at one point, Trump specifically referred to it as the "ban on free press". So rhetorically it's not like he's dancing around the constitutionality.
  • Rights must be demanded and defended constanrly, otherwise some tin pot dictator will take them without much of a fight.

    Do you what your rights or not?

Explore Birbla archives