Birbla

Join the discussion

Write your take first — we'll ask for email only when you're ready to publish.

Sign in
  • Hacker News
  • tbh maybe it's good and changes something quicker and on the long term that rich people experience it firsthand before the Maldives or Bangladesh

    (probably nothing just me being optimistic but the rich always have a get out of jail card, like X more properties)

    by unpopularopp
  • It also almost washed out the San Clemente track. Which re-opened in 3 days despite having waves crash over it.
    by kylehotchkiss
  • I would think the dominating factors in Oregon and California are their uplifted soft geologies. The orogenies that lifted the West have resulted in an elevated, cliff-bounded sandy coastline along the Pacific that has been aggressively eroding for a lot longer than humans have been there.
    by netbioserror
  • The Seattle Times ran an article maybe last year that measurements of sea level at Seattle had increased 8 inches over the last century.

    The flaw in that is what is the reference frame? The tectonic plate Seattle is sitting on is going down under the cascade mountains.

    And beaches have been eroding for millions of years.

    by WalterBright
  • [Insert HbomberguyShoutingAtBenShapiro.gif here]
    by WillowWithAWand
  • Im pretty sure _don't look up_ was supposed to be a scathing indictment of climate change deniers, but it makes me wonder how many people living in low low-lying areas of the seacoast claim to believe that climate change is real and happening and vote for everyone else to change their lives but ignore the water lapping at their doorstep
    by readthenotes1
  • It's annoying for coastal areas, and a problem for beach houses, but California isn't really that vulnerable to rising sea levels. The Pacific Coast is mountainous and the ground slopes upward in short distances.

    Here's the US topo map.[1] Look at vulnerable spots, such as Malibu and Oceanside. Three blocks inland you're 20 feet above sea level. Almost all problems are on the ocean side of the Pacific Coast Highway, which was a marginal place to build anyway.

    Cliff edge erosion is an ongoing problem. That's why CALTRANS gave up on Devil's Slide as a road route and built the Tom Lantos Tunnels further inland. Small changes in sea level don't affect hundred-foot cliffs that much, though.

    The places that really suffer from rising sea level are river deltas, sitting on deposited sand just barely above sea level. In the US, New Orleans has the worst problem. New York City has problems, and they're building coast defenses against storms. China's coastal cities are mostly on river deltas with really flat terrain. That's why China has to build ports way off shore, reached by miles of bridges, to get to deep water.

    [1] https://en-us.topographic-map.com/map-9t5k57/Venice-Beach/?c...

    by Animats
  • Coastal erosion =/= sea level rise.

    This is textbook expected behavior on a high energy deep water coast (eg cliffs, not mangroves)

    by beerandt

Explore Birbla archives