Join the discussion
Write your take first — we'll ask for email only when you're ready to publish.
- Hacker News
- by toomuchtodo
- "The department never had a contract with Flock, but the officers used the technology in an ad hoc manner, the police said in a statement. The officers received access to Flock after representatives of the company offered them a free trial, the statement said."
Ah, the good ol' shadow IT method of selling directly to the end users. Good ol' salesman scum.
by kotaKat - How does their business model work with subpoenas? If the police don't pay to use them, but the camera witnesses a crime, can't they get a judge to order the video because it's evidence in a criminal investigation and/or trial?
What about a civil case? Can an individual get a court order for flock to release evidence that it may have (or definitely has) relevant to a divorce case or other lawsuit?
They evade accusations of constitutional violation because they're a private company. But other private companies have to turn over records all the time (credit card purchases for example).
by gosub100