Join the discussion

Write your take first — we'll ask for email only when you're ready to publish.

  • Hacker News
  • It helps us practice critical thinking. What it doesn’t do is help us practice knowing WHEN to use critical thinking.
  • > if she finds an error to gain more XP

    What does this mean?

  • I think speed would be irrelevant, or perhaps would discourage deep engagement with the problems.

    I think presenting it as AI can be wrong is not as valuable as presenting it as developing the ability to question what one is told. (e.g. Verizon Math)

  • This is an interesting idea, but I need more than one sample to get a feel for it. I did the example on the homepage, and then one more that it linked to, and both had extremely basic errors my kid would have no problem with (currently doing Math Academy prealgebra, approx year 9/8th grade level). I'd suggest allowing people to try more than one very basic error.
  • Reminds me of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QAMA_Calculator - a calculator that won't reveal the precise answer until you supply an estimate (physical hardware in 2014, I think the current version is an app.) The website makes claims about the pedagogic value, but I didn't see any actual citations at https://qama.world/the-science/ just "everyone knows" kind of things... but if they had research supporting it that would probably inform your approach?

Explore Birbla archives