Join the discussion

Write your take first — we'll ask for email only when you're ready to publish.

  • Hacker News
  • Brave search is the best alternative to Google. They have an independent index and good UI. Very rarely do I switch to another engine. Brave does well at surfacing forum threads and the AI summary has been surprisingly good for a while.

    https://www.privacyguides.org/en/search-engines/

  • Just google it with Bing.

    It pains me that DuckDuckGo has the name that it has, since you can't even pretend to want to use that as a verb. You can use generic terms, and that's what I tend to do (usually just 'look it up (on the web)', alternativly 'search the web'), but there's good reason google entered the common lexicon and functionally replaced those terms, and finding a replacement that is as good is very, very hard.

  • I'm not anti-Google by any means. But their products just aren't as essential in my life like they were 10 years ago. I'm not in the majority but ...

    Google Photos -> Immich (better)

    Google Search -> Claude (better)

    Google Calendar -> Apple Calendar (better)

    Google Chrome -> Safari or Firefox - someone please make a basic browser that can handle 30 tabs without needing gigs of memory

    Google Maps -> .... I've been seeing if MapQuest is "good enough"

    GMail -> .... I think Fastmail is "good enough" - GMail's bells and whistles aren't as important anymore

  • Say what you will, but using "google" is just the fastest way to say "search the web." Unless a better, equally convenient phrase comes along, it’s not going anywhere anytime soon.
  • Google’s masterstroke is their very choice of name. Google, or Google Search, was originally named “Backrub” (and YouTube was founded as a hookup/dating app) but essentially, Google has reduced the developed world to seemingly incoherent baby-talk gurgling.

    The number "googol" was a term coined, in my understanding, because the mathematician was a new father, and his infant child was asked about the number 1e100, and replied with a goo-goo gurgle, which endeared the guy so much that he wrote about it.

    So, by transitive means, “Google” is primitive, unadorned baby-talk gibberish, and since the simple eloquence of Microsoft products is now disfavored, we have regressed from adulthood to… Childhood’s End.

  • I have no problem with this person choosing to use different language to describe this.

    But I do have a problem generally with attempts to impose language changes on others (in the case of this post you only see that tendency in the title).

    This sort of linguistic prescriptivism seems in vogue for political reasons lately, most saliently in the hordes of people who insist that you must not use natural anthropomorphic language when talking about LLMs, but that’s far from the only political attempt to control language we’ve seen recently. Let people talk how they want! Langauage is an evolving thing that shouldn’t be controlled by scolds!

  • Around here "google it" has been replaced by "spørg botten" which means "ask the bot" or "spørg GPT". I've been putting an effort into saying "look it up" and stuff like it instead of "google it" for a couple of years now. Looks like it'll probably be wasted effort soon though.
  • I've been doing this since I started using Kagi since it sounds weird to say "I googled it and..." when I didn't actually use Google. I'm also not saying "I kagiied it" since half the people I talk to don't know what it is and for the rest it still sounds awkward so I've been going with variations for "I searched for it", "I did a web search", "I looked it up"...

    While "google" may end up like the "kleenex" of web search, it seems more likely that people stop searching the web at all and just ask AI instead.

    There's no good verb for "I asked ChatGPT", is there? "I slopped it"?

    edit: maybe I'll bring back "bing it" since nobody would actually assume you're using bing for it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrEHTd_3vD0

Explore Birbla archives