Join the discussion

Write your take first — we'll ask for email only when you're ready to publish.

  • Hacker News
  • Hope to see a new market for disabling telemetry and phonehome features from cars. It should be legal to do so, if you own the car I suppose. I'm thinking that rigth now few pople even know how much spying their new car does to them but this will change and as awareness grows more and more people will want to do it.
  • Ha ha, you fools! No one is collecting my data from my 22-year-old Scion while I drive past Flock cameras every day.

    Wait...

  • When I buy an EV, one of the first things I intend to do is disable or block the chips using Wi-Fi and/or cellular from broadcasting further. If that means a faraday shield around the computers in question, so be it.

    Everything I need can be handled via CarPlay or physical dials/buttons in the vehicle. All this surveillance - on post-COVID priced vehicles no less, averaging ~$50k - is absurd, and I refuse to engage with it.

  • Interesting to see how this has evolved. Mozilla had conducted a detailed investigation on this topic by carmaker a few years ago: https://www.mozillafoundation.org/en/blog/privacy-nightmare-...
  • > As one notable exception, Honda improved its data collection practices to prevent sending precise geolocation to a third party associated with user tracking.

    I know what my next car will be.

  • The ongoing theme of all these responses was shifting the blame to the consumer.

    As expected. I think consumers also need to push back on these practices, but the problem is, majority of consumers are tech savy but not privacy savy.

  •   if an owner decides they are uncomfortable with the data sharing described within them, they are faced with (arguably) unfair choices:
      - 01 accept the agreements regardless of their concerns
      - 02 stop using their car's connected-vehicle features - which includes remote start, the app, and other very useful features
      - 03 stop using the vehicle entirely
    
    Easy, I take #2. Is that it? This whole time I thought the article was talking about telemetry the car sends regardless.
  • I currently drive a mid 2000s Ford truck, which runs great and meets my needs, but lately I got interested in minivans/people carriers. I pretty quickly realized that newer vehicles seem to not just record, but export a lot of driving data.

    The minivan market is small. There are really only 4-5 available and every single one sends telemetry data from the car and makes it hard/impossible to opt out of selling your data. Additionally, without pretty extensive work there is no means of physically disabling the telemetry, which forces you to trust they'll honor your opt out request (vs re-enabling it with some update).

    I'm clearly in the vast minority on this, but it's so frustrating that there are no options beyond buying and installing a third-party bypass to disable this type of tracking. Worse, I'm aware that the absence of data is data itself. Is my insurance going raise my rates because my vehicle won't provide telemetry for them to buy?

Explore Birbla archives