How to scale intent, quality, and artistry with AI [video]

Join the discussion

• Hacker News
• instead, human slop with that ted talk format.

  all for the following. 1. give a shit. 2. build a system and codify it 3. review iterate and recreate 4. be creative

  by mpalczewski
• If someone says AI art is good, I think the one saying that is AI too.
  by Armecera
• Just stumbled on this on YouTube and was compelled to share. This is the best (relatively) short form piece I’ve seen on avoiding AI slop while simultaneously embracing the gifts of AI
  by simonjgreen
• "...Use the good judgment of the human and scale with the AI" this is the way.
  by KazaNLP
• She could have a great career in audiobook narration
  by chakintosh
• The points made in this video were great and key to modern day development. Often times AI just copies the same formula that gives "good" results but those results now just scream AI such as purple gradients in hero sections. Being intentional with your design choices is a must which this video explains well.
  by Zarar_Ahmed
• The problem isn't that you can't use AI to uplevel your creativity. It's that doing it slows you down, so you end up at a marked disadvantage, because others who just prompt "hey Claude, make me X" will produce 100 good enough slop-pieces in the time it takes you to finish one.

  For the vast majority of paying customers or social media appreciators, that low-effort slop is sufficient. It's cheap, fast, and gets better with every passing month. So if your overriding goal is to scale to win in that marketplace, then you can only scale by giving up on quality and artistry. It's a race to the bottom.

  I think the only way to win is to push back on the notion that you need to work on superhuman scale in the first place. You can differentiate yourself from AI by asserting you're human and that there's inherent value in human art. You'll find some customers willing to pay extra for that, just like some hire a woodworker instead of buying at Ikea. But it's going to be a tough market for artisans because fewer and fewer people are forced to buy the fruits of your intellectual labor.

  In software engineering specifically, we gleefully decided that speed and cost are the only thing that matters and we celebrate "hey Claude, make me X" projects the same as we celebrate human ingenuity (case in point: HN front page). So for SWEs, even that "I'm a human" route may be unavailable.

  by socializer
• Many people have no interest at all in art, if it is not used for connection with others. Scale all you want, humanity overwhelming rejects it.

  The end result is that certain genres of art (digital paintings, video games, digital music) will die, and people will return to participating in the real world. The purveyors of artistic expression will flow back towards those who perform in the real world, with different recombinations of the genre, tending towards those that can allow for recognition of genuine expression.

  AI will kill certain genres of art, and many more genres of art will be born.

  by vuurmot