Join the discussion
Write your take first — we'll ask for email only when you're ready to publish.
- Hacker News
- Bemusing quote from TFA: "I agree that in-person debates are confrontational and bad for truth-seeking. But I didn't propose a debate in order to seek truth. I proposed it because, under California Penal Code § 415(1), it's illegal for me to challenge you to a duel. I think your public writing on this topic has been dishonorable. Out of obligation, I will respond to the meaty arguments that you have set out for me. But what would be viscerally satisfying would be to make you get up on a stage where I read your own words to you in real time and ask 'Really? Really?' after each sentence. Then I could watch you squirm as you try to square your output with your status as one of America's top public intellectuals."by Exoristos
- I've never really considered the classic Skynet scenario, maybe because I've never watched Terminator.
But I agree with the article, it seems reasonable that when AI has enough factories to sustain itself it just decides to wipe out all the humans.
(I don't know about you all, but I was very worried around GPT-2/3 and I've been grieving since. We've already lost so much with the latest introductions of thinking machines, and it keeps taking, likely it will take our lives soon.)
by bmacho