Join the discussion

Write your take first — we'll ask for email only when you're ready to publish.

  • Hacker News
  • If I go directly to the URL it wants me to agree to some stuff before I even know what the service is. I had to come to these comments to figure that out (without agreeing to anything first).
  • Why the hell do I need to sign in?
  • Is there an open standard or something for people generating images to encode them or is the standard private and only shared with frontier model builders? That's a shame if latter. But pretty cool standardizing technology.
  • Finally, the previous implementations were very silly! OpenAI had a nice tool, but it only detected their own watermarks, and Google's process was "upload the image to Gemini and ask if it's AI generated", which seemed like a perplexing waste of tokens and breath.

    (While a sibling comment points out putting the image through Google Image Search as an alternative, I don't remember this being signposted in the support article I've read, so I unfortunately didn't know about it)

  • It's a real shame Google isn't more transparent about how it actually works, and doesn't provide any mechanism for classifying images in bulk or offline.

    This is the best SynthID write-up I've found so far: https://fyx.me/articles/attempting-model-extraction-of-googl...

    It covers how it actually works (probably), and how to train your own classifier for it, with some seemingly decent results.

  • It's baffling that this requires auth. OpenAI's own tool (https://openai.com/research/verify/) doesn't require auth.

    Even Google themselves previously offered a no-auth way (just very niche): if you uploaded an image to Google Image search, and went to "About this image", it would show if the image was Google AI-generated. Now it doesn't.

Explore Birbla archives