Discussion summary

The Trump administration is suspending Microsoft from a green card program, prompting mixed reactions. Some see it as a political move, while others discuss broader immigration and AI implications.

What the discussion says

  • Suspicion that the move targets Microsoft for political reasons.
  • Supporters see it as a positive step in immigration policy.
  • Critics believe it may be a political tactic ahead of elections.
  • Some commenters discuss AI and automation reducing jobs.
  • Others mention the impact on remote work and meritocracy.
“Soundworlds suspects political motives behind the move.”
— soundworlds
“A supporter calls it a good step.”
— dayyan

Join the discussion

Write your take first — we'll ask for email only when you're ready to publish.

  • Hacker News
  • I was thinking about this the other day in the context of the boardwalk town that I vacation in sometimes. There are a lot of college student aged workers who come from Europe for the summer and work in every service industry job imaginable in town. There are agencies that find these European workers and help them find jobs and housing.

    It makes me wonder why there aren't more American young adults taking these jobs. I think it would be great fun to live at the beach for the summer. Maybe the wages are too low, or American kids are focused on internships? Or maybe the European workers are better employees? I don't know.

  • It's always seemed odd to me that your employer somehow sponsors your Green Card. It always felt like it should simply be a measure of

    A) How long you have been working as an H1B in the united states (say 10 years).

    B) How much you have paid in taxes (say 1 million).

    Whenever either of the above has occured, you take some citizenship test, and then you have a green card. Nothing to do with your employer dangling something for you, literally a measure of your employment history and/or taxable income.

  • Microsoft -https://h1bgrader.com/h1b-sponsors/microsoft-corporation-ew2...

    Wipro - https://h1bgrader.com/h1b-sponsors/wipro-limited-l9k5mz3r21/...

    I picked two examples to show the disparity. I do like where this is going, but as it frequently happens, it feels like a weapon than can be wielded selectively.

    A law should handle fraud across all abusers.

  • I know the administration is controversial, but this is the correct thing to do for a lot of reasons.

    The biggest one is the program itself is racist as hell. Microsoft is literally bringing in foreigners, paying them much less to do the same damn job.

  • A company that I worked for would hire foreign grads out of school on F-1 visas with zero experience; they’d come on board using the OPT extensions (good for up to 3 years) and then file for H1Bs immediately. If they didn’t get it they’d file again the next year and so on. If they get to year 3 of the OPT without getting an H1B they would be sent to an office in Europe where they work for a year and then get transferred back on an L1.

    FWIW H1B recipients immediately get started on the PERM/GC process (if they wish), with only whatever new-grad level plus 0..2 years experience they have accumulated thus far.

    Meanwhile job ads are posted in the kitchens as required by law (and I’m sure the local newspapers) with ~$80K salaries even though I that way way below what they paid even for new (US) grads [in the Boston area]. So no surprise no one ever applies for them (if they even see it).

  • The US will do anything but have a sane worker visa program, with clear path to citizenship. The lottery system is built to be gamed and so is the performative local "hiring" attempts.

    On the flip side it always surprises me how rabid HN can be about throwing out H1B workers. I am sure some of the people who you may have come across were not deserving of it, but a large amount of them work hard to come here and setup roots. Cancelling visas or deporting them will not get American workers their jobs back. Please spare a moment to consider the pain and anguish it brings to families.

    > with clear path to citizenship.

    Or no path at all. Tying the citizenship carrot to the visa and letting the employers hold the stick is the worst of all possible outcomes.

  • Vance said “They’ll put an advertisement in a small-town newspaper. They’ll go out there and say that ‘We have advertised for a position with our company, and nobody is responding to it.’ And they will use that lack of response to then go and replace American workers with what is effectively foreign indentured servants”

    My understanding is that this is pretty much how everyone does it, no? Not to say that I'm surprised that they're applying this argument asymmetrically to their allies vs. foes, of course, nor to say that I necessarily agree / disagree with this tactic.

Explore Birbla archives