Birbla

Login
    Meta announces Oakley smart glasses (theverge.com)
    94 points by jmsflknr - 7 hours ago

  • Looks cool but I just hate the heaviness and feel of wearing acetate. If they ever make titanium smartglasses I'll be all over them.
    by garbawarb - 6 hours ago
  • Come on, why would you make smart glasses with a clear shell and then hide the electronics behind an inner shielding layer? I want all the circuits on display.
    by LorenDB - 6 hours ago
  • My elderly mother-in-law is slowly going blind. She relies on Meta glasses to read print on everything — from the back of a can to the mail. She also uses them to help locate items around the house, whether it’s something on the counter or in the living room.

    I’ve tried the glasses myself, and I’m convinced that wearable eyewear like this will eventually replace the mobile phone. With ongoing advances in miniaturization, it’s only a matter of time before AR and AV are fully integrated into everyday wearables.

    by sleepyguy - 6 hours ago
  • I was looking at the Ray-Ban version of these for a few minutes before I realized there’s no HUD… I wouldn’t even consider a dev kit for one of these unless I had some kind of ability to add a dragon ball scouter widget to show the power level on the lens…
    by luxuryballs - 6 hours ago
  • won't buy these, or any others smart glasses until there's a way to replace the battery. I'm annoy'd enough that it's difficult to do with bluetooth headphones... with my quest 3 at least there's an option to plug it into an external battery, given the traditional use cases.
    by amazingamazing - 5 hours ago
  • A side note, but it is very unfortunate luck that the pendulum of fashionable eye-wear has swung back towards 80's/90's style thin frame/no frame glasses.

    You really need young people to carry tech like this, and needing them to wear millennial fashion from 10 years ago so camera and compute fit will just make it that much harder.

    by Workaccount2 - 5 hours ago
  • Why did Zuck think it was okay to post a photo of himself wearing them? Does he think his cool looks will drive sales? The little interest I had immediately disappeared after seeing it.
    by paxys - 5 hours ago
  • Stub for oftopicness
    by tomhow - 5 hours ago
  • I don't think we should normalize pointing cameras at people's faces all the time. I hate these things.
    by make3 - 4 hours ago
  • So how do you prevent Meta from gathering secrets displayed for even a tenth of a second on an employee' screen? You'll have to ask security to check everyone's glasses now?
    by wiether - 4 hours ago
  • This is just my opinion but these look even worse that the 1940's+ military issued BC glasses. BC as in birth control. [1] At least it will be easy to spot the glassholes [2] for now at least.

    [1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GI_glasses

    [2] - https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=glassholes

    by Bender - 4 hours ago
  • Still no SDK though, what’s the point of smart glasses that only do what Meta lets them?

    I’m personally more excited about the Mentra Live glasses, which are fully programmable with AugmentOS.

    by OkGoDoIt - 4 hours ago
  • Weird take: my biggest annoyance with Meta glasses after 1+ year of almost daily usage is that there is no way to switch from Meta AI to any other voice AI.
    by divan - 4 hours ago
  • So there's no AR aspect to the lens on any of these Meta-partnered smart sunglasses, right? I assumed that was standard on all of them. Naive, I know, because that would require some amazing hardware. But it does go to show that we're still far from the Star Trek future that other simpleton consumers like myself might be hoping for / expecting.
    by kaycebasques - 4 hours ago
  • I was stoked when I saw these headlines cause I generally prefer Oakley to Ray Ban in terms of style, but these look nothing like Oakley's! Personally I don't like round glasses, I like more square glasses. Dang!
    by dustbunny - 4 hours ago
  • Until they make it so you can replace the battery I'm not going to buy.
    by post_break - 4 hours ago
  • I will miss being able to see people’s eyes.
    by kgilpin - 3 hours ago
  • Does it even matter if they have Oakley or any other logo on them? Aren't they all luxotica anyway?
    by Raed667 - 3 hours ago
  • No mention of weight in the article or on the official product page?
    by toephu2 - 3 hours ago
  • That's why they were spamming me several times in the last few weeks to buy the ray ban ones - trying to clear inventory.
    by noisy_boy - 3 hours ago

© 2025 Birbla.com, a Hacker News reader · Content · Terms · Privacy · Support