Discussion summary

Recent discussions highlight concerns about hidden backdoors in Tenda firmware across multiple versions, raising security and ethical questions.

What the discussion says

  • Many users believe backdoors are common in consumer electronics.
  • Some suggest Chinese companies are more prone to such practices.
  • US and Israeli companies have also been implicated in backdoor concerns.
“Almost all consumer electronics come with backdoors—especially given the prevalence of computational advertising.”
— finalhacker
“This must have been some sort of stupidity… if they tried to build in some backdoor, they would have done it differently…”
— deeddy

Join the discussion

Write your take first — we'll ask for email only when you're ready to publish.

  • Hacker News
  • The US/Israel would never do such a thing, buy UniFi/Fortinet/Palo Alto!
  • Have used their travel wifi product back when hotel wifi was a strange beast. Wouldn't expect to need it now eSIM and ubiquitous internet travel pricing means the hotel wifi may be the LEAST valid path to access things.

    I have a free give-away mikrotik unit in the same price bracket (literally free: they were both conference give-aways) it's physically smaller and it runs what appears to be their mainline code. Say what you like about microtik for quality, they provide pretty much every knob and frob you could want.

    by ggm
  • And this is why I handroll my own routers/firewalls, using commodity hardware and a Linux distribution.
  • Oh this is amazing! I have a few of their cube routers sitting around and I always hated how app-locked their firmware was when it really is just a wifi repeater with a few extras (mesh) on top. Root access will do wonders to bypassing the app now (and also disabling their ping-for-green-light mechanism which spams the network with a constant dns resolution to microsoft.com lol).

    Also honest take this looks less like a "backdoor" (implies malicious - this is a link to a CVE after all) and more like a developer access credential/default credential that was burned into the firmware (i'd imagine the code remains but on a production run they randomize the key so its non-guessable but then you get lazy and dont run that extra step and this slips in/you burn the bare firmware with no production configs).

  • The consistency with which networking hardware companies produce such garbage is crazy.

    And it’s always amateur hour backdoors somehow. If it was something sophisticated they might get a pass on „ok some security agency made them do it probably“

  • > The associated username is not validated, so any provided username will succeed when paired with the backdoor password.

    Great. I am really wondering why should the customers trust these manufacturers.

    At this point I would not use any router with vendor-provided black box firmware. Full stop.

    I would always install OpenWRT or something similar on it before using it.

    And if that is not possible for whatever reason, I would not even think about buying such a device.

  • > Tenda is a supplier of home and business network devices such as routers, switches, wireless access points, and video surveillance equipment.

    I was unfamiliar with Tenda.

    > Shenzhen Tenda Technology Co.,Ltd. ( https://www.tendacn.com/us/profile )

    Tenda may just rebrand, right? It seems like many chinese brands will either rebrand or have a 'competing' brand with the same internals but different externals. (I have no idea if Tenda does this, I've just seen it previously. Specifically with security cameras)

    I wish the authors provided some method for checking this vulnerability other than fw version. It seems like Tenda could just change the password and say "yep! all safe now"

  • The article doesn't disclose the value of "sys.rzadmin.password", but this writeup from 2022 does:

    https://boschko.ca/tenda_ac1200_router/

    Spoiler: it's "rzadmin". And it looks like there are a bunch of other goodies in the firmware, too.

Explore Birbla archives